Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dizneeluvr
I voted that they do need to do a thrill park. This doesn't have to consist of only roller coasters, they need to incorporate the 3-D rides similar to Spiderman and the Mummy (haven't been there since that opened though so don't really know what it's like).
I have a 13 year old daughter who is a thrill ride junkie and she loves Disney but when we asked about vacation to Cedar Point or Disney, she decided Cedar Point. We have thought for the last couple of years that Disney needs to add another park devoted solely for thrill rides and the like.
Disney is obviously like any other corporation in America, they are wanting the all mighty dollar. Wouldn't it be in their best interest to build a park like Universal and keep the money that vacationers spend at Universal in their own world?
|
I agree 100% that they need to add more "thrill" rides but not a park. I too would choose Cedar Point if I was a teen(gotta love the Dragster,Raptor and Millenium) but now as a parent with smaller kids WDW is our choice for a week long trip but we also do the Point for 2 days every summer. The addition of Everest at AK will help and they do need to add 1(much speculated) at the MK. Universal does steal away the teen and 20's crowd definitely but Disney I don't think will ever lose their niche for the crowd they attract.