[downsouthtigger]

Originally Posted by DoomBuggy05

Now about that CM carrying me....

Yeah my dw get's one of those...me

Seriously though should there be more perks for resort guests? Yes
Do they get a lot now? Honestly I don't know...the free parking and transportation thing I think kinda sucks. I mean stayin on prop I only use the transportation, so whats the point of free parking? (well aside from cast parking at AK, which is way better than the bus stops!-wait only cast parks there anyways, nevermind) I think the perks could be revised, maybe 10% off food and bev when you show your resort key? The EMH are a great incentive, but to me its only worth it at night when you get 3 extra hours.
As for AP holders they get good perks right now, although I can understand those being too close and not wantin to stay the night but thats the trade off.

[CerealBoxQueen]

I've only been to Disneyland, but yeah, I think Annual Passport holders should get more perks.
If it's people who are just getting the AP for the perks, ie they buy an AP instead of a Hopper, I would think the park would welcome the extra cash.
I intend to buy an AP instead of a hopper so I can stay for a week and get the freebies and 10% offs and what not and I would welcome ANY AND ALL perks that come with it.
I mean I am paying 50 bucks more, for the same amount of time most likely.

[llama]

I'm of two minds on this. One one hand, I think all park guests should be treated equally - on the other hand, you're supporting the Disney corporation by staying at their resorts, so an acknowledgement would be nice.

As DVC members I certainly would welcome a few perks. The way I look at it is, we've invested our money with Disney. It would be nice if Disney acknowledged our investment - but the perks few and far between.

[Cavey]

Originally Posted by DoomBuggy05

He put your quote but responded to my question. Again, the cave air kicking in. I just thought I would take the heat for you.

I'll still get paid every two weeks regardless of what he thinks, so in his words "Of course, I don't care".

DB05

Whoa, nelly. You read w-a-a-a-y too much into my post. I write a lot of posts tongue-in-cheek (or foot-in-mouth). So if in doubt, assume I'm joking. (Unless, it's about that resort snob, EJ. She suddenly starts hob nobbing with models and now she thinks WDW was built for her sole enjoyment.)

Anyway, a few other things:

1. Please don't kick puppies. It's not nice.

2. I don't go to "mines." I go to "caves."

3. The "I don't care" comment was directed at UO, not at you. I meant no offense.

4. I get paid weekly, rather than every two weeks.

5. EJ knows I her. (which explains the restraining order!)

6. I would have no problem with AP holders getting EMH privileges.

[DoomBuggy05]

Originally Posted by Cavey

Whoa, nelly. You read w-a-a-a-y too much into my post. I write a lot of posts tongue-in-cheek (or foot-in-mouth). So if in doubt, assume I'm joking. (Unless, it's about that resort snob, EJ. She suddenly starts hob nobbing with models and now she thinks WDW was built for her sole enjoyment.)

Anyway, a few other things:

1. Please don't kick puppies. It's not nice.

2. I don't go to "mines." I go to "caves."

3. The "I don't care" comment was directed at UO, not at you. I meant no offense.

4. I get paid weekly, rather than every two weeks.

5. EJ knows I her. (which explains the restraining order!)

6. I would have no problem with AP holders getting EMH privileges.

Yeah, whatever.
DB05

[pumouse]

Just FYI, you cannot improve on the best, and that is what Cavey is!

[Cavey]

Originally Posted by pumouse

Just FYI, you cannot improve on the best, and that is what Cavey is!

Thanks, princess!

[Peppertink]

Wow...what happened here? When I left it was a friendly conversation and it turned nasty(pretty quickly). I think that someone doesn't know that a lot of stuff here is said with a wink and a smile.......

[FireAngel]

I totally agree with Pumouse.

Ok, I agree that AP holders have a lot of benefits and thats great, and yes guests who do stay on site should get more perks at the parks than guests not staying on site, because not only are you supporting the Disney Company, but spending more money But, as far as when you are at the park ALL GUESTS ARE CREATED EQUAL!! During normal park hours.

[Peppertink]

Originally Posted by Peppertink

I agree with your point that AP holders usually live close enough to WDW and visit a lot more often then traditional vacationers. I am an AP holder for the DLR and we go VERY often and sometimes we go on rides, other times we don't. That's the joy of being an AP. I don't think it would be fare to vacationers who don't visit often if DLR had EMH and AP holders were included as well. I can go back lots of time for gosh sake, they are only there for a week or two(most of the time). I think keeping EMH a resort guest only benefit is a great idea!

Gosh just read my post...maybe I came across too strong I'm sorry if I offended anyone
In re-tinking about EMH...maybe if DLR did have it...I, as an AP holder would probably want the ability to join in the fun. Hmmm....I guess everyone can disregard my original comment.

[dwoodz]

How about 20% discount on character meals!

[queensmama]

Ummmmm, who left monorail man get back on the computer? Oh sorry, did I say that outloud?

[FireAngel]

[FireAngel]

20 % dicount on character meals, nope you wont get it cause they will add on 15 % gratuity (sp) charges

[Dadoo]

I stay at a Disney resort because it is part of the Disney experience. I look for and often get 'perks', and there is always the free transportation. Now about that CM shoulder carry mentioned...at my age, I find that to be a great idea, a wonderful perk, but a bit uncomfortable....hehehe